[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Question about the return value of 'local'
From: |
Greg Wooledge |
Subject: |
Re: Question about the return value of 'local' |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Dec 2012 08:21:41 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.3i |
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 08:37:02AM +0100, Francis Moreau wrote:
> Then maybe an option should be added to 'local' to display the full
> description that one can get from the manual, or maybe change the
> behaviour of '-m' switch ?
Almost every builtin command has a shorter and less informative
description in the shell's 'help' than it does in the manual. The
'help' output is supposed to be a brief reminder of the syntax (e.g.
"which option letter was that..."), not a repetition of the entire
manual.
I do sympathize with the difficulty of finding the relevant information
in the manual sometimes, though, especially for builtins that are common
words like 'set'.
- Question about the return value of 'local', Francis Moreau, 2012/12/13
- Re: Question about the return value of 'local', Andreas Schwab, 2012/12/13
- Re: Question about the return value of 'local', Francis Moreau, 2012/12/13
- Re: Question about the return value of 'local', Chet Ramey, 2012/12/14
- Re: Question about the return value of 'local', Dan Douglas, 2012/12/14
- Re: Question about the return value of 'local', Bill Gradwohl, 2012/12/14
- Re: Question about the return value of 'local', Steven W. Orr, 2012/12/14
- Re: Question about the return value of 'local', Bill Gradwohl, 2012/12/14
- Re: Question about the return value of 'local', Stefano Lattarini, 2012/12/14
- Re: Question about the return value of 'local', Stefano Lattarini, 2012/12/14