[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: shouldn't /+(??) capture 2 letter files only?
|
From: |
DJ Mills |
|
Subject: |
Re: shouldn't /+(??) capture 2 letter files only? |
|
Date: |
Fri, 14 Dec 2012 21:30:19 -0500 |
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 8:37 PM, gregrwm <backuppc-users@whitleymott.net>wrote:
> > echo !(??|foo|bar)
>
> precisely where i started this thread, !(??)
>
+(??) and !(??) are completely different things. !(??) was never mentioned
in the original question, and should work as expected.
- shouldn't /+(??) capture 2 letter files only?, gregrwm, 2012/12/13
- Re: shouldn't /+(??) capture 2 letter files only?, Dan Douglas, 2012/12/13
- Re: shouldn't /+(??) capture 2 letter files only?, DJ Mills, 2012/12/13
- Re: shouldn't /+(??) capture 2 letter files only?, Dan Douglas, 2012/12/13
- Re: shouldn't /+(??) capture 2 letter files only?, gregrwm, 2012/12/14
- Re: shouldn't /+(??) capture 2 letter files only?, Rene Herman, 2012/12/14
- Re: shouldn't /+(??) capture 2 letter files only?, gregrwm, 2012/12/14
- Re: shouldn't /+(??) capture 2 letter files only?, Rene Herman, 2012/12/14
- Re: shouldn't /+(??) capture 2 letter files only?,
DJ Mills <=
- Re: shouldn't /+(??) capture 2 letter files only?, gregrwm, 2012/12/15
- Re: shouldn't /+(??) capture 2 letter files only?, DJ Mills, 2012/12/15
- Re: shouldn't /+(??) capture 2 letter files only?, gregrwm, 2012/12/16
Re: shouldn't /+(??) capture 2 letter files only?, Rene Herman, 2012/12/13