[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ignoring current shell and always running posix shell? Re: Should th
From: |
Chet Ramey |
Subject: |
Re: ignoring current shell and always running posix shell? Re: Should this be this way? |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Mar 2013 09:36:21 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4 |
On 3/14/13 2:52 AM, Linda Walsh wrote:
>
>
> Chet Ramey wrote:
>> The default bash behavior and the SuSE modification are both conformant.
> ----
> Is 'rbash' not part of POSIX?
Posix has chosen not to standardize the restricted shell, either `rsh' or
`set -r'.
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU address@hidden http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/
- Re: ignoring current shell and always running posix shell? Re: Should this be this way?, (continued)
- Re: ignoring current shell and always running posix shell? Re: Should this be this way?, Chet Ramey, 2013/03/12
- Re: ignoring current shell and always running posix shell? Re: Should this be this way?, Linda Walsh, 2013/03/14
- Re: ignoring current shell and always running posix shell? Re: Should this be this way?, Chris Down, 2013/03/14
- Re: ignoring current shell and always running posix shell? Re: Should this be this way?, Greg Wooledge, 2013/03/14
- If rbash is worthless, why not remove it and decrease bloat?, Linda Walsh, 2013/03/15
- Re: If rbash is worthless, why not remove it and decrease bloat?, Bob Proulx, 2013/03/15
- Re: If rbash is worthless, why not remove it and decrease bloat?, Chet Ramey, 2013/03/16
- Re: If rbash is worthless, why not remove it and decrease bloat?, Chris Down, 2013/03/16
- Re: If rbash is worthless, why not remove it and decrease bloat?, Pierre Gaston, 2013/03/16
- Re: If rbash is worthless, why not remove it and decrease bloat?, Chris Down, 2013/03/16
- Re: ignoring current shell and always running posix shell? Re: Should this be this way?,
Chet Ramey <=