[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Issues with exported functions
|
From: |
Steve Simmons |
|
Subject: |
Re: Issues with exported functions |
|
Date: |
Sat, 27 Sep 2014 09:32:19 -0400 |
On Sep 27, 2014, at 2:19 AM, Eric Blake <address@hidden> wrote:
> The prefix is nice for quick identification, but what is ESSENTIAL is
> something that puts shell functions in a namespace that is untouchable
> by normal shell variables (the "()" suffix in Florian's patch). If all
> you do is add a prefix, but still leave the environment containing what
> can still collide with a shell variable name, you are still vulnerable.
Repeated for truth.
- Re: Issues with exported functions, (continued)
- Re: Issues with exported functions, Linda Walsh, 2014/09/25
- Re: Issues with exported functions, David A. Wheeler, 2014/09/27
- Message not available
- Re: Issues with exported functions, Ángel González, 2014/09/28
- Re: Issues with exported functions, Eric Blake, 2014/09/29
- Re: Issues with exported functions, Ángel González, 2014/09/29
Re: Issues with exported functions, becker . rg, 2014/09/27