[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: doc improvement for dotglob
From: |
Ian Kelling |
Subject: |
Re: doc improvement for dotglob |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Sep 2016 22:22:20 -0700 |
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016, at 11:08 AM, Chet Ramey wrote:
>
> Thanks for the report. There should be something in there about `.'
> and `..' always having to be matched explicitly.
Yw. I noticed another improvement that could be made to the
docs. How do you prefer patches? And, I assume you manually deal
with the duplication in different doc formats, is that right?