bug-bash
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: built-in printf %f parameter format depend on LC_NUMERIC


From: Dennis Clarke
Subject: Re: built-in printf %f parameter format depend on LC_NUMERIC
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 15:46:56 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.0

On 7/12/19 3:25 PM, Chet Ramey wrote:
On 7/12/19 3:22 PM, Eli Schwartz wrote:
On 7/12/19 3:16 PM, Chet Ramey wrote:
On 7/12/19 12:46 PM, Léa Gris wrote:
Le 09/07/2019 à 22:02, Chet Ramey écrivait :

These are up to the system's strtol/strtod. I don't know of too many
strtol implementations that use the thousands separator and numeric
grouping.

Chet and you other Bash maintainers or contributors dudes:

I can foresee the implications and blockages even lightly considering the
possibility to align the Bash's built-in printf behavior with the %f
argument with the sibling GNU Coreutils printf implementation.

I don't think I explained this very well. For input, the printf builtin
relies on strtod(3) to parse the string into a floating point number. For
output, it relies on printf(3) to display a floating point number as a
string. I'm not really interested in re-implementing either one if the
system libc provides one that's perfectly acceptable. On POSIX-conformant
systems, those library functions generally honor the locale's decimal_point
character as the radix character.

The `bc' you're using isn't POSIX conformant.


https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/bc.html#tag_20_09_16

"The bc utility always uses the <period> ( '.' ) character to represent
a radix point, regardless of any decimal-point character specified as
part of the current locale.

Good catch. I went by the bc man page that Dennis Williamson posted.


Well the man page for XPG6 bc in Solaris 10 claims :

ENVIRONMENT VARIABLES
     See environ(5) for descriptions of the following environment
     variables  that  affect  the  execution of bc: LANG, LC_ALL,
     LC_CTYPE, LC_MESSAGES, and NLSPATH.


Really?

Looking through "Standards, Environments, and Macros" environ(5) seems
to be bluntly saying :


         Most commands will invoke setlocale(LC_ALL, "") prior to
         any other processing. This allows the command to be used
         with  different  national  conventions  by  setting  the
         appropriate environment variables.

uh huh ...

         LC_NUMERIC

             This category specifies the  decimal  and  thousands
             delimiters.  The  information  corresponding to this
             category is stored in a  database   created  by  the
             localedef()    command.   The   default   C   locale
             corresponds to "." as the decimal delimiter  and  no
             thousands  delimiter.  This  environment variable is
             used by localeconv(3C), printf(3C), and strtod(3C).

yep.

corv $
corv $ LC_ALL=fr_FR.UTF-8 LC_NUMERIC=fr_FR.UTF-8 /usr/xpg6/bin/bc -l
a = 0,1
syntax error on line 1, teletype
a = 0.1
b = 0.11
c = a + b
c
.21

c(c)
.97803091472414824491

corv $

baloney.   :-)

I am going to look at the sources for bc just for the fun of it.


--
Dennis Clarke
RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC
UNIX and Linux spoken
GreyBeard and suspenders optional























reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]