[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Likely Bash bug
|
From: |
David |
|
Subject: |
Re: Likely Bash bug |
|
Date: |
Wed, 17 Mar 2021 23:37:32 +1100 |
On Wed, 17 Mar 2021 at 23:05, Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 10:59:42AM +0700, Robert Elz wrote:
> > | Operating system is BionicPup64 8.0.
> > That might. More importantly is probably whatever package management
> > system it uses. I have no idea what the "ash" the bug report refers to
> > is (there is an ancient shell of that name, but I cannot imagine any
> > distribution including that, instead of one of its bug fixed and updated
> > successors, like say, dash)
> "ash" is often secret code for "busybox sh".
> In this specific case, I'm not sure *what* it is. I googled a few things
> and came up with this page:
> http://wikka.puppylinux.com/Ash
That page was last edited in 2011.
The package list for BionicPup64 8.0 (or other versions) can be found here:
https://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=puppy&pkglist=true&version=8.0#pkglist
Looks like the provided shells are bash 4.4.18 and busybox 1.29.3
But I wonder if this bug is reproducible even by the reporter.