[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Light weight support for JSON
From: |
Lawrence Velázquez |
Subject: |
Re: Light weight support for JSON |
Date: |
Sun, 28 Aug 2022 16:18:15 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Cyrus-JMAP/3.7.0-alpha0-841-g7899e99a45-fm-20220811.002-g7899e99a |
On Sun, Aug 28, 2022, at 4:05 PM, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> At 2022-08-28T15:52:55-0400, Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 28, 2022, at 2:56 PM, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
>> > How about next July, when JSON is as exactly old as the Bourne shell
>> > was when JSON was deployed?
>>
>> I do not find "well *actually* JSON is old too!!!" to be particularly
>> persuasive, either.
>
> It's a perfectly valid rejoinder to a claim that the format is too novel
> to be seriously considered. That you don't regard it as persuasive is
> consistent with your protest not being a rational one in the first
> place
Agree to disagree.
--
vq
Re: Light weight support for JSON, Dale R. Worley, 2022/08/28
Re: Light weight support for JSON, Chet Ramey, 2022/08/29
Re: Light weight support for JSON, Chet Ramey, 2022/08/29
Re: Light weight support for JSON, John Passaro, 2022/08/28