[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bash "extglob" needs to upgrade at least like zsh "kshglob"
From: |
Greg Wooledge |
Subject: |
Re: bash "extglob" needs to upgrade at least like zsh "kshglob" |
Date: |
Sat, 29 Oct 2022 08:15:21 -0400 |
On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 04:50:00PM +1100, Martin D Kealey wrote:
> This seems like a good reason to simply translate extglobs into regexes,
> which should run in linear time, rather than put effort into building and
> debugging a parallel implementation.
This isn't straightforward, because of the !(list) feature of extglob.
There's no analogous construct for that in standard regexes.
- bash "extglob" needs to upgrade at least like zsh "kshglob", Hyunho Cho, 2022/10/28
- Re: bash "extglob" needs to upgrade at least like zsh "kshglob", Greg Wooledge, 2022/10/28
- Re: bash "extglob" needs to upgrade at least like zsh "kshglob", Martin D Kealey, 2022/10/29
- Re: bash "extglob" needs to upgrade at least like zsh "kshglob", Oğuz İsmail Uysal, 2022/10/30
- Re: bash "extglob" needs to upgrade at least like zsh "kshglob", Martin D Kealey, 2022/10/30
- Re: bash "extglob" needs to upgrade at least like zsh "kshglob", Oğuz, 2022/10/30
- Re: bash "extglob" needs to upgrade at least like zsh "kshglob", Greg Wooledge, 2022/10/31
- Re: bash "extglob" needs to upgrade at least like zsh "kshglob", Oğuz İsmail Uysal, 2022/10/31
- Re: bash "extglob" needs to upgrade at least like zsh "kshglob", Chet Ramey, 2022/10/31