Re: 'wait -n' with and without id arguments

[Chet Ramey]

On 9/25/24 6:14 PM, Robert Elz wrote:
>      Date:        Wed, 25 Sep 2024 16:15:07 -0400
>      From:        Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu>
>      Message-ID:  <20daab70-09e2-4dfa-a98a-4ba29b62229a@case.edu>
>
>    | Do you think the text you quoted satisfies the "unless otherwise 
> specified?"
>
> I think "unspecified whether it is removed at A or B" is fairly clear
> that it is intended to be removed.
>
> I don't disagree that the wording about all of this could be better,
> but the best way to make it better would be to first agree on what
> it should say, or there will just be more "unspecified whether..."

If it's going to be unspecified, it will be because there are conflicting
implementations, not because we can't decide on the right language.

--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
                 ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU    chet@case.edu    http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/

OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature