[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 'wait -n' with and without id arguments
From: |
Robert Elz |
Subject: |
Re: 'wait -n' with and without id arguments |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Sep 2024 00:18:34 +0700 |
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2024 10:39:23 -0400
From: Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu>
Message-ID: <f5870201-5ffe-4f1c-8160-4434687e62d6@case.edu>
| If it's going to be unspecified, it will be because there are conflicting
| implementations, not because we can't decide on the right language.
Yes, of course, and it wasn't the wording I meant, but the objective.
If we can agree what should be done, we can avoid unspecified, even if
some implementations don't comply (yet), or only comply in posix mode.
If we can't, we don't really change much by altering what is there now.
kre
- Re: 'wait -n' with and without id arguments, (continued)
Re: 'wait -n' with and without id arguments, Chet Ramey, 2024/09/25
Message not available
Re: 'wait -n' with and without id arguments, Chet Ramey, 2024/09/05