[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ionice kills vanilla 2.6.0-test9 was [Re: [PATCH] cfq + io prioritie
From: |
Linus Torvalds |
Subject: |
Re: ionice kills vanilla 2.6.0-test9 was [Re: [PATCH] cfq + io priorities (fwd)] |
Date: |
Fri, 21 Nov 2003 15:05:23 -0800 (PST) |
[ Trivial test input file included, and "bug-binutils" added to the CC ]
On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> Just do "gdb vmlinux" and do "disassemble system_call" to see this. It
> says something like
>
> cmp $0x448,%eax
> jae syscall_badsys
>
> and it _should_ use just 274 (0x112 rather than 0x448) on x86.
>
> Now, I wonder if this has ever worked, of which binutils version broke
> it..
Some looking around shows that it works correctly on a SuSE box with
GNU assembler version 2.13.90.0.18 (i486-suse-linux) using BFD version
2.13.90.0.18 20030121 (SuSE Linux)
GNU ld version 2.13.90.0.18 20030121 (SuSE Linux)
but is broken on RH Fedora core 1:
GNU assembler version 2.14.90.0.6 (i386-redhat-linux) using BFD version
2.14.90.0.6 20030820
GNU ld version 2.14.90.0.6 20030820
So it definitely _does_ work in some versions, and the bug appears to be
new to binutils 2.14, with 2.13 doing the right thing.
You can trivially see if with a simple assembly file like
start:
.long 1,2,3,a
a=(.-start)/4
where 2.13.90 as shipped by SuSE will get it right (and generate a list of
1,2,3,4), while 2.14.90 from Fedora core will generate 1,2,3,16.
Linus
- Re: ionice kills vanilla 2.6.0-test9 was [Re: [PATCH] cfq + io priorities (fwd)],
Linus Torvalds <=