[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug ld/609] --fatal-warnings behaves badly with any other printing opti
From: |
Tomer dot Levi at nsc dot com |
Subject: |
[Bug ld/609] --fatal-warnings behaves badly with any other printing option |
Date: |
10 Jan 2005 09:46:52 -0000 |
------- Additional Comments From Tomer dot Levi at nsc dot com 2005-01-10
09:46 -------
Subject: Re: --fatal-warnings behaves badly with any other
printing option
Hi Nick,
Sorry for the late response (Christmas...).
I tried your patch and indeed it fixes the bug.
Can you please submit it and close the issue ?
Many thanks.
Regards,
Tomer Levi
Software Engineer phone:
+49-8141-35-1378
CompactRISC Development Tools fax: +49-8141-35-11-1378
National Semiconductor GmbH mailto:address@hidden
Livry-Gargan Str. 10 internet:
http://www.national.com
82256 Fuerstenfeldbruck, Germany
"nickc at redhat dot com" <address@hidden>
01/05/05 05:54 PM
Please respond to sourceware-bugzilla
To: address@hidden
cc:
Subject: [Bug ld/609] --fatal-warnings behaves badly with any
other printing option
------- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-01-05 15:54
-------
Hi Tomer,
The fix for this problem seems to be quite simple - pass an extra
argument to
the vfinfo() function telling it whether it is emitting a warning message
or an
information message. As is done by the attached patch. Would you like to
try
it out and let me know if you find any problems with it ?
Cheers
Nick
ld/ChangeLog
2005-01-05 Nick Clifton <address@hidden>
* ldmisc.c (vfinfo): Add an extra argument: warning. Use
this to
determine whether config.make_executable should be set to
FALSE in
conjunction with config.fatal_warnings.
(info_msg, minfo, lfinof): Pass FALSE as the extra
argument.
(einfo): Pass TRUE as the extra argument.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |WAITING
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=609
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
--
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=609
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.