[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug binutils/872] strip segv
From: |
nickc at redhat dot com |
Subject: |
[Bug binutils/872] strip segv |
Date: |
25 Apr 2005 14:26:32 -0000 |
------- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-04-25 14:26
-------
Hi Pawe³,
The seg fault was caused by a silly fault in the name_list handling code
inside the copy_archive() function. The 'obfd' field was not being initialised
to a proper value. The attached patch fixes this problem and allows your test
case to run, although it still generates the "Invalid operation" message.
Do you have any problems with this patch or shall I close this PR ?
Cheers
Nick
binutils/ChangeLog
2005-04-25 Nick Clifton <address@hidden>
PR872
* objcopy.c (copy_archive): Initialise 'obfd' field of new
name_list structure.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |WAITING
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=872
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
- [Bug binutils/872] New: strip segv, pluto at pld-linux dot org, 2005/04/25
- [Bug binutils/872] strip segv, pluto at pld-linux dot org, 2005/04/25
- [Bug binutils/872] strip segv, pluto at pld-linux dot org, 2005/04/25
- [Bug binutils/872] strip segv, nickc at redhat dot com, 2005/04/25
- [Bug binutils/872] strip segv, pluto at pld-linux dot org, 2005/04/25
- [Bug binutils/872] strip segv, nickc at redhat dot com, 2005/04/25
- [Bug binutils/872] strip segv,
nickc at redhat dot com <=