[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug ld/6519] __start_SECNAME undocumented
From: |
drow at sources dot redhat dot com |
Subject: |
[Bug ld/6519] __start_SECNAME undocumented |
Date: |
21 May 2008 12:07:21 -0000 |
------- Additional Comments From drow at sources dot redhat dot com 2008-05-21
12:07 -------
I didn't realize this was only done for orphaned sections. I suppose it's
harder to do for things mentioned in the linker script, and there's an obvious
way to do it manually - in keeping with the verbose and precise nature of GNU
linker scripts. I've been tossing around ideas for a less verbose format,
possibly for gold which already works well without one...
Meanwhile, for this bug. I'm not sure about editing the NEWS entry since the
current behavior may be more recent than 2.6. But the manual change looks
perfect to me.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6519
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
- [Bug ld/6519] New: __start_SECNAME undocumented, drow at sources dot redhat dot com, 2008/05/14
- [Bug ld/6519] __start_SECNAME undocumented, nickc at redhat dot com, 2008/05/21
- [Bug ld/6519] __start_SECNAME undocumented, nickc at redhat dot com, 2008/05/21
- [Bug ld/6519] __start_SECNAME undocumented,
drow at sources dot redhat dot com <=
- [Bug ld/6519] __start_SECNAME undocumented, nickc at redhat dot com, 2008/05/21
- [Bug ld/6519] __start_SECNAME undocumented, nickc at redhat dot com, 2008/05/21
- [Bug ld/6519] __start_SECNAME undocumented, drow at sources dot redhat dot com, 2008/05/21