[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: assertion failure with gas and broken syntax

From: H.J. Lu
Subject: Re: assertion failure with gas and broken syntax
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 07:19:15 -0700

On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 4:44 AM, Nick Clifton <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi Per, Hi H.J.,
> H.J. - this email is in response to a x86 assembler bug report from Per that
> was posted here:
>  http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-binutils/2008-09/msg00006.html
> I have a patch to fix the problem (attached) but I am not sure if you will
> like it.  Possibly the error should be caught earlier, before the attempt to
> apply the fixup ?
> The patch includes a new test to cover the example in the original email and
> a tweak to an existing test that is altered by the patch.  If you are OK
> with it please let me know and I will apply the patch to the sources.
> Cheers
>  Nick
> gas/ChangeLog
> 2008-09-18  Nick Clifton  <address@hidden>
>        * config/tc-i386.c (md_apply_fix): Refuse fixups against register
>        symbols.
> gas/testsuite/ChangeLog
> 2008-09-18  Nick Clifton  <address@hidden>
>        * gas/i386/inval-symbol.s: New test.
>        * gas/i386/inval-symbol.l: Expected listing.
>        * gas/i386/i386.exp: Run new test.
>        * gas/i386/inval-equ-2.l: Update expecting listing output.

Hi Nick,

I think it is another form of


We fixed it in generic assembler. If we want to fix this
one in x86 backend, should we revert the fix for PR 5543?


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]