[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug ld/7027] 64-bit libstdc++.so fails to link on Solaris 11/SPARC: cou
From: |
ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE |
Subject: |
[Bug ld/7027] 64-bit libstdc++.so fails to link on Solaris 11/SPARC: could not read symbols: Bad value |
Date: |
17 Nov 2008 17:48:42 -0000 |
------- Additional Comments From ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
2008-11-17 17:48 -------
Subject: Re: 64-bit libstdc++.so fails to link on Solaris 11/SPARC: could not
read symbols: Bad value
Hi Nick,
> (Only the last line has changed).
done, but not much better either: at first I get a lot of assertion
failures
GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.19.50.20081111
Supported emulations:
elf32_sparc
elf64_sparc
/vol/gccsrc/obj/binutils-2.19.50-g/ld/ld-new: warning: section `.bss' type
changed to PROGBITS
/vol/gccsrc/obj/binutils-2.19.50-g/ld/ld-new: BFD (GNU Binutils)
2.19.50.20081111 assertion fail
/vol/gnu/src/binutils/binutils-dist/bfd/elfxx-sparc.c:2701
/vol/gccsrc/obj/binutils-2.19.50-g/ld/ld-new: BFD (GNU Binutils)
2.19.50.20081111 assertion fail
/vol/gnu/src/binutils/binutils-dist/bfd/elfxx-sparc.c:2701
/vol/gccsrc/obj/binutils-2.19.50-g/ld/ld-new: BFD (GNU Binutils)
2.19.50.20081111 assertion fail
/vol/gnu/src/binutils/binutils-dist/bfd/elfxx-sparc.c:2701
/vol/gccsrc/obj/binutils-2.19.50-g/ld/ld-new: BFD (GNU Binutils)
2.19.50.20081111 assertion fail
/vol/gnu/src/binutils/binutils-dist/bfd/elfxx-sparc.c:2701
/vol/gccsrc/obj/binutils-2.19.50-g/ld/ld-new: BFD (GNU Binutils)
2.19.50.20081111 assertion fail
/vol/gnu/src/binutils/binutils-dist/bfd/elfxx-sparc.c:2664
[1838 assertion failures total ...]
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x00090d60 in _bfd_sparc_elf_relocate_section (output_bfd=0x1c5ea0,
info=0x19d998, input_bfd=0x391be8, input_section=0x3b80c0, contents=0x1080538
"address@hidden", relocs=0x3c62d8, local_syms=0xc69be8,
local_sections=0xa08fb0) at
/vol/gnu/src/binutils/binutils-dist/bfd/elfxx-sparc.c:2703
(gdb) p local_got_offsets
$1 = (bfd_vma *) 0x0
Rainer
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7027
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
- Re: [Bug ld/7027] 64-bit libstdc++.so fails to link on Solaris 11/SPARC: could not read symbols: Bad value, (continued)
- [Bug ld/7027] 64-bit libstdc++.so fails to link on Solaris 11/SPARC: could not read symbols: Bad value, ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE, 2008/11/14
- [Bug ld/7027] 64-bit libstdc++.so fails to link on Solaris 11/SPARC: could not read symbols: Bad value, nickc at redhat dot com, 2008/11/14
- [Bug ld/7027] 64-bit libstdc++.so fails to link on Solaris 11/SPARC: could not read symbols: Bad value, ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE, 2008/11/14
- [Bug ld/7027] 64-bit libstdc++.so fails to link on Solaris 11/SPARC: could not read symbols: Bad value, ian at airs dot com, 2008/11/16
- [Bug ld/7027] 64-bit libstdc++.so fails to link on Solaris 11/SPARC: could not read symbols: Bad value, nickc at redhat dot com, 2008/11/17
- [Bug ld/7027] 64-bit libstdc++.so fails to link on Solaris 11/SPARC: could not read symbols: Bad value, nickc at redhat dot com, 2008/11/17
- [Bug ld/7027] 64-bit libstdc++.so fails to link on Solaris 11/SPARC: could not read symbols: Bad value, ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE, 2008/11/17
- [Bug ld/7027] 64-bit libstdc++.so fails to link on Solaris 11/SPARC: could not read symbols: Bad value, nickc at redhat dot com, 2008/11/17
- [Bug ld/7027] 64-bit libstdc++.so fails to link on Solaris 11/SPARC: could not read symbols: Bad value,
ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE <=
- [Bug ld/7027] 64-bit libstdc++.so fails to link on Solaris 11/SPARC: could not read symbols: Bad value, nickc at redhat dot com, 2008/11/17
- [Bug ld/7027] 64-bit libstdc++.so fails to link on Solaris 11/SPARC: could not read symbols: Bad value, ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE, 2008/11/17
- [Bug ld/7027] 64-bit libstdc++.so fails to link on Solaris 11/SPARC: could not read symbols: Bad value, ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE, 2008/11/17
- [Bug ld/7027] 64-bit libstdc++.so fails to link on Solaris 11/SPARC: could not read symbols: Bad value, ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE, 2008/11/17
- [Bug ld/7027] 64-bit libstdc++.so fails to link on Solaris 11/SPARC: could not read symbols: Bad value, nickc at redhat dot com, 2008/11/18
- [Bug ld/7027] 64-bit libstdc++.so fails to link on Solaris 11/SPARC: could not read symbols: Bad value, nickc at redhat dot com, 2008/11/18
- [Bug ld/7027] 64-bit libstdc++.so fails to link on Solaris 11/SPARC: could not read symbols: Bad value, ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE, 2008/11/18
- [Bug ld/7027] 64-bit libstdc++.so fails to link on Solaris 11/SPARC: could not read symbols: Bad value, nickc at redhat dot com, 2008/11/18