[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug ld/7027] 64-bit libstdc++.so fails to link on Solaris 11/SPARC: cou
From: |
ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE |
Subject: |
[Bug ld/7027] 64-bit libstdc++.so fails to link on Solaris 11/SPARC: could not read symbols: Bad value |
Date: |
18 Nov 2008 13:05:39 -0000 |
------- Additional Comments From ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
2008-11-18 13:05 -------
Subject: Re: 64-bit libstdc++.so fails to link on Solaris 11/SPARC: could not
read symbols: Bad value
Hi Nick,
> OK, I have uploaded a third patch for you to try. This one works(1) for me
> although to be honest I do not really see how it is different from the second
> patch. Anyway give it a whirl and see how you go.
>
> Cheers
> Nick
>
> (1) Where "works" means that the linker does not complain and a binary is
> produced. I cannot tell you if the binary is actually functional.
this one looks quite good: I can now successfully link the 64-bit
libstdc++.so. Unfortunately, regtesting the resulting GCC build is
currently hampered by the following warning:
/vol/gcc/obj/binutils-2.19.50-g/ld/ld-new: warning: section `.bss' type changed
to PROGBITS
This is harmless during the build, but many testcases (not only c++ and
libstdc++-v3) fail due to the unexpected message.
Thanks.
Rainer
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7027
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
- Re: [Bug ld/7027] 64-bit libstdc++.so fails to link on Solaris 11/SPARC: could not read symbols: Bad value, (continued)
- [Bug ld/7027] 64-bit libstdc++.so fails to link on Solaris 11/SPARC: could not read symbols: Bad value, nickc at redhat dot com, 2008/11/17
- [Bug ld/7027] 64-bit libstdc++.so fails to link on Solaris 11/SPARC: could not read symbols: Bad value, ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE, 2008/11/17
- [Bug ld/7027] 64-bit libstdc++.so fails to link on Solaris 11/SPARC: could not read symbols: Bad value, nickc at redhat dot com, 2008/11/17
- [Bug ld/7027] 64-bit libstdc++.so fails to link on Solaris 11/SPARC: could not read symbols: Bad value, ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE, 2008/11/17
- [Bug ld/7027] 64-bit libstdc++.so fails to link on Solaris 11/SPARC: could not read symbols: Bad value, ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE, 2008/11/17
- [Bug ld/7027] 64-bit libstdc++.so fails to link on Solaris 11/SPARC: could not read symbols: Bad value, ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE, 2008/11/17
- [Bug ld/7027] 64-bit libstdc++.so fails to link on Solaris 11/SPARC: could not read symbols: Bad value, nickc at redhat dot com, 2008/11/18
- [Bug ld/7027] 64-bit libstdc++.so fails to link on Solaris 11/SPARC: could not read symbols: Bad value, nickc at redhat dot com, 2008/11/18
- [Bug ld/7027] 64-bit libstdc++.so fails to link on Solaris 11/SPARC: could not read symbols: Bad value,
ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE <=
- [Bug ld/7027] 64-bit libstdc++.so fails to link on Solaris 11/SPARC: could not read symbols: Bad value, nickc at redhat dot com, 2008/11/18
- [Bug ld/7027] 64-bit libstdc++.so fails to link on Solaris 11/SPARC: could not read symbols: Bad value, ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE, 2008/11/18
- [Bug ld/7027] 64-bit libstdc++.so fails to link on Solaris 11/SPARC: could not read symbols: Bad value, nickc at redhat dot com, 2008/11/18
- [Bug ld/7027] 64-bit libstdc++.so fails to link on Solaris 11/SPARC: could not read symbols: Bad value, ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE, 2008/11/18
- [Bug ld/7027] 64-bit libstdc++.so fails to link on Solaris 11/SPARC: could not read symbols: Bad value, nickc at redhat dot com, 2008/11/18
- [Bug ld/7027] 64-bit libstdc++.so fails to link on Solaris 11/SPARC: could not read symbols: Bad value, ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE, 2008/11/18
- [Bug ld/7027] 64-bit libstdc++.so fails to link on Solaris 11/SPARC: could not read symbols: Bad value, nickc at redhat dot com, 2008/11/19