[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: binutils 2.19 issue with kernel link
From: |
Alan Modra |
Subject: |
Re: binutils 2.19 issue with kernel link |
Date: |
Sat, 11 Jul 2009 09:35:03 +0930 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) |
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 10:27:26AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> binutils-2.19 _end is what we expect
> binutils-2.19.1 _end is what we expect
> binutils-2.19.50.0.1 _end is what we expect
> binutils-2.19.51.0.1 _end is 00001000
>
> From the release notes:
>
> binutils-2.19.50.0.1 is based on CVS binutils 2008 1007
> binutils-2.19.51.0.1 is based on CVS binutils 2009 0106
Yes, I already have good reason to suspect this patch
2008-10-22 Alan Modra <address@hidden>
* ldlang.c (lang_output_section_find_by_flags): Handle non-alloc
sections.
* emultempl/elf32.em (enum orphan_save_index): Add orphan_nonalloc.
(hold): Likewise.
(gld${EMULATION_NAME}_place_orphan): Handle non-alloc orphans.
causes the change in linker behaviour. Did you try the patch I posted?
--
Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM
- Re: binutils 2.19 issue with kernel link, (continued)
- Re: binutils 2.19 issue with kernel link, Kumar Gala, 2009/07/09
- Re: binutils 2.19 issue with kernel link, Kumar Gala, 2009/07/09
- Re: binutils 2.19 issue with kernel link, Alan Modra, 2009/07/09
- Re: binutils 2.19 issue with kernel link, Kumar Gala, 2009/07/09
- Re: binutils 2.19 issue with kernel link, Edmar Wienskoski-RA8797, 2009/07/09
- Re: binutils 2.19 issue with kernel link, Alan Modra, 2009/07/10
- Re: binutils 2.19 issue with kernel link, Kumar Gala, 2009/07/10
- Re: binutils 2.19 issue with kernel link, Alan Modra, 2009/07/10
- Re: binutils 2.19 issue with kernel link, Kumar Gala, 2009/07/10
- Re: binutils 2.19 issue with kernel link, Kumar Gala, 2009/07/10
- Re: binutils 2.19 issue with kernel link,
Alan Modra <=
- Re: binutils 2.19 issue with kernel link, Alan Modra, 2009/07/10