[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug binutils/10413] New: Does -j sectname do anything useful?
From: |
martyleisner at yahoo dot com |
Subject: |
[Bug binutils/10413] New: Does -j sectname do anything useful? |
Date: |
19 Jul 2009 00:00:10 -0000 |
I would expect something like:
objdump -h -j .data /bin/ls
would dump only the header info of the .data section...it seems to dump all
sections
I have a patch (with respect to the recent snapshot of 2.19.51) which does
does:
address@hidden:/usr/local/obj/binutils-2.19.51/binutils$ ./objdump -h -j .data
/bin/ls
/bin/ls: file format elf64-x86-64
Sections:
Idx Name Size VMA LMA File off Algn
23 .data 000001d0 000000000061a2e0 000000000061a2e0 0001a2e0 2**5
CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, DATA
which I expect.
(I don't see how to add a patch yet to a bug)
--
Summary: Does -j sectname do anything useful?
Product: binutils
Version: 2.20 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: binutils
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: martyleisner at yahoo dot com
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10413
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
- [Bug binutils/10413] New: Does -j sectname do anything useful?,
martyleisner at yahoo dot com <=