[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug gas/10479] Too strict checks for addw / subw instructions
From: |
asl at math dot spbu dot ru |
Subject: |
[Bug gas/10479] Too strict checks for addw / subw instructions |
Date: |
9 Aug 2009 20:52:40 -0000 |
------- Additional Comments From asl at math dot spbu dot ru 2009-08-09 20:52
-------
(In reply to comment #1)
> Created an attachment (id=4124)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4124&action=view)
> proposed fix
>
> Hi, please review this proposed patch, which attempts to fix the validation
> checks that wrongly reject good instructions.
Looks ok for me!
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10479
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
- [Bug gas/10479] New: Too strict checks for addw / subw instructions, asl at math dot spbu dot ru, 2009/08/04
- [Bug gas/10479] Too strict checks for addw / subw instructions, dgutson at codesourcery dot com, 2009/08/05
- [Bug gas/10479] Too strict checks for addw / subw instructions, nlewycky at google dot com, 2009/08/06
- [Bug gas/10479] Too strict checks for addw / subw instructions, dgutson at codesourcery dot com, 2009/08/09
- [Bug gas/10479] Too strict checks for addw / subw instructions,
asl at math dot spbu dot ru <=
- [Bug gas/10479] Too strict checks for addw / subw instructions, dgutson at codesourcery dot com, 2009/08/10
- [Bug gas/10479] Too strict checks for addw / subw instructions, asl at math dot spbu dot ru, 2009/08/10
- [Bug gas/10479] Too strict checks for addw / subw instructions, nickc at redhat dot com, 2009/08/10
- [Bug gas/10479] Too strict checks for addw / subw instructions, asl at math dot spbu dot ru, 2009/08/10