[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug ld/10518] [regression] handling of wildcards in version scripts
From: |
amodra at bigpond dot net dot au |
Subject: |
[Bug ld/10518] [regression] handling of wildcards in version scripts |
Date: |
14 Aug 2009 04:07:36 -0000 |
------- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2009-08-14
04:07 -------
The linker script shown has two global wildcard matches. As the ld info doc
says, this is slightly crazy. They both match "test_new", so which one should
ld choose? The most specific match? How do you do that in general? eg. is
"tes*" a better match than "*new" for "test_new"? (If we make a special case
for "*", why stop there?)
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10518
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
- [Bug ld/10518] New: [regression] handling of wildcards in version scripts, doko at debian dot org, 2009/08/13
- [Bug ld/10518] [regression] handling of wildcards in version scripts,
amodra at bigpond dot net dot au <=
- [Bug ld/10518] [regression] handling of wildcards in version scripts, ryanryan52 at gmail dot com, 2009/08/20
- [Bug ld/10518] [regression] handling of wildcards in version scripts, ryanryan52 at gmail dot com, 2009/08/20
- [Bug ld/10518] [regression] handling of wildcards in version scripts, amodra at bigpond dot net dot au, 2009/08/23
- [Bug ld/10518] [regression] handling of wildcards in version scripts, cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org, 2009/08/27
- [Bug ld/10518] [regression] handling of wildcards in version scripts, amodra at bigpond dot net dot au, 2009/08/27