[Bug binutils/3017] binutils/doc/Makefile.in uses syntax not accepted by solaris /bin/sh

[Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de]

------- Additional Comments From Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de  2009-08-17 
17:09 -------
If I understand this bug report correctly, then it is not present in the current
CVS sources any more.  This change seems to have removed the offending code:

2007-03-15  H.J. Lu  [...]
[...]

        * doc/Makefile.am (binutils_TEXINFOS): Removed.
        (AM_MAKEINFOFLAGS): Add -I ../../bfd/doc.
        (TEXI2DVI): Likewise.
        (config.texi): Removed.
        (MOSTLYCLEANFILES): Remove config.texi.
        * doc/Makefile.in: Regenerated.

        * doc/binutils.texi: Include bfdver.texi instead of
        config.texi.

The code to generate bfdver.texi in bfd/doc/Makefile.am seems to not contain
any issues offending Solaris /bin/sh.  Of course, 'date +%B %Y' is still not
portable, and is used in the rule to create bfdver.texi, but it's needed only
when hacking on the build system anyway; also, that's not what this bug report
is about.  :-)

The "..`..".."..`.." nesting is not present in the bfdver.texi rule any more.

Can this bug thus be closed?

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3017

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.