[Bug ld/10629] GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.20.51.20090910 cores

[george dot tovrea at baesystems dot com]

------- Additional Comments From george dot tovrea at baesystems dot com  
2009-09-15 15:12 -------
Subject: RE:  GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.20.51.20090910 cores

I tried the patch without success but the problem does appear to be in that 
area of the code. I inserted some debug statements and found only one was hit 
before the core. I am trying to narrow it down and I'll keep you up to date on 
what I find.

Regards,
Bill T.

-----Original Message-----
From: nickc at redhat dot com [mailto:address@hidden 
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2009 9:26 AM
To: Tovrea, George W (US SSA)
Subject: [Bug ld/10629] GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.20.51.20090910 cores


------- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com  2009-09-14 16:26 
-------
Hi Bill,

> Not sure why you need simple.o since it is "simple" to compile,

Because without it I have to create a compiler and then compile simple.cc.  Plus
I have to hope that I am using the same set of compiler sources as you and that
I have configured the compiler in the same way.

> but it and xerces 28 are attached

Well the simple.o file appears to be missing, but I had a go at creating one for
myself.  As a result I have created a workaround patch which *may* work.  Please
give it a go and see if it helps.  I am not familiar with this particular area
of the linker though, so this is definitely a workaround not a fix.

Cheers
  Nick




-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10629

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.