[Bug gold/12392] Many static link tests fail

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12392

--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-01-12 
14:44:49 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Passing the -t option to the linker will get you a complete list of all object
> files and shared libraries that the linker includes in the link.
> 
> The warning about sys_errlist being deprecated suggests that your system is
> going to generate a warning on any static link.  At least, I don't see 
> anything
> in basic_static_test which would refer to errlist, so I think the reference
> must be coming from libgcc or libc itself.  Does the GNU linker give a warning
> when linking with -static?

No, the GNU linker doesn't give this warning.  Maybe gold warns about the
symbol definition?

> The error about __rel_iplt_start and __rel_iplt_end not being defined is very
> odd.  The 32-bit x86 linker always defines those when linking with -static.

I will produce a tarfile with the objects, anything else you want to know?

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.