|
From: | trevor.hemsley at ntlworld dot com |
Subject: | [Bug gold/12433] Linking libjvm.so with LTO fails with undefined references |
Date: | Tue, 25 Jan 2011 02:14:40 +0000 |
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12433 --- Comment #2 from Trevor Hemsley <trevor.hemsley at ntlworld dot com> 2011-01-25 02:14:25 UTC --- That branch also helps reduce the undefined refs even further. I did notice that memory usage peaked at 6.4GB this time round but the trunk+patch version may have got to that too because it dropped back after a few minutes to 5.7GB. The undefined refs with binutils-hjl are now /sources/java/control/build/linux-amd64/hotspot/outputdir/linux_amd64_compiler2/product/libjvm.so: undefined reference to `void G1ParPushHeapRSClosure::do_oop_nv<oopDesc*>(oopDesc**)' /sources/java/control/build/linux-amd64/hotspot/outputdir/linux_amd64_compiler2/product/libjvm.so: undefined reference to `void FilterOutOfRegionClosure::do_oop_nv<oopDesc*>(oopDesc**)' /sources/java/control/build/linux-amd64/hotspot/outputdir/linux_amd64_compiler2/product/libjvm.so: undefined reference to `void FilterAndMarkInHeapRegionAndIntoCSClosure::do_oop_nv<oopDesc*>(oopDesc**)' /sources/java/control/build/linux-amd64/hotspot/outputdir/linux_amd64_compiler2/product/libjvm.so: undefined reference to `void FilterIntoCSClosure::do_oop_nv<oopDesc*>(oopDesc**)' /sources/java/control/build/linux-amd64/hotspot/outputdir/linux_amd64_compiler2/product/libjvm.so: undefined reference to `void UpdateRSOopClosure::do_oop_work<oopDesc*>(oopDesc**)' /sources/java/control/build/linux-amd64/hotspot/outputdir/linux_amd64_compiler2/product/libjvm.so: undefined reference to `void UpdateRSOopClosure::do_oop_work<unsigned int>(unsigned int*)' /sources/java/control/build/linux-amd64/hotspot/outputdir/linux_amd64_compiler2/product/libjvm.so: undefined reference to `void G1ParScanClosure::do_oop_nv<oopDesc*>(oopDesc**)' -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |