[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug ld/12700] New: "BFD_ASSERT (out_attr[Tag_ABI_HardFP_use].i == 0) "
From: |
21cnbao at gmail dot com |
Subject: |
[Bug ld/12700] New: "BFD_ASSERT (out_attr[Tag_ABI_HardFP_use].i == 0) " assert |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Apr 2011 13:48:00 +0000 |
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12700
Summary: "BFD_ASSERT (out_attr[Tag_ABI_HardFP_use].i == 0) "
assert
Product: binutils
Version: 2.21
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
AssignedTo: address@hidden
ReportedBy: address@hidden
I found Jie has committed a patch
"http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2010-05/msg00083.html". I am using
the newest binary utils and encounted the following ASSERT in
arm_elf32.c:
+ if (out_attr[i].i == 0)
+ {
+ BFD_ASSERT (out_attr[Tag_ABI_HardFP_use].i == 0);
My compiling options are as below,
ASM_FLAGS :=
\
-gdwarf-2 \
-mfpu=vfp \
-mfloat-abi=softfp \
-mthumb-interwork
C_FLAGS :=
\
$(ASM_FLAGS) \
-O3 -Wno-all \
-fno-optimize-sibling-calls \
-mlong-calls \
-ffunction-sections \
CPP_FLAGS :=
\
-fno-rtti \
-fno-exceptions \
LINK_FLAGS :=
\
--gc-sections -nostdlib \
-L ../stdlib \
-Wl,--as-needed \
-Wl,-no-enum-size-warning \
--cref \
ARFLAGS :=
\
rcs
Can anyone give me any tip about why the assert is triggered?
-barry
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Bug ld/12700] New: "BFD_ASSERT (out_attr[Tag_ABI_HardFP_use].i == 0) " assert,
21cnbao at gmail dot com <=