[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug ld/13991] powerpc-rtems ld failure [regression]
From: |
ian at airs dot com |
Subject: |
[Bug ld/13991] powerpc-rtems ld failure [regression] |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Apr 2012 17:30:08 +0000 |
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13991
Ian Lance Taylor <ian at airs dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ian at airs dot com
--- Comment #7 from Ian Lance Taylor <ian at airs dot com> 2012-04-23 17:30:08
UTC ---
I agree with Joel that this appears to be a bug in the GNU binutils. If you
use --just-symbols=EXE, then any symbol defined in EXE should be defined for
use in the link. It should be an absolute symbol with the value that it has in
EXE. In this case __rtems_start is defined in EXE with a value of 0. The
linker should not give an "undefined symbol" error here.
I don't see how H.J.'s patch could lead to this problem, but perhaps it does
somehow.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
- [Bug ld/13991] New: powerpc-rtems ld failure [regression], joel.sherrill at oarcorp dot com, 2012/04/18
- [Bug ld/13991] powerpc-rtems ld failure [regression], joel.sherrill at oarcorp dot com, 2012/04/18
- [Bug ld/13991] powerpc-rtems ld failure [regression], joel.sherrill at oarcorp dot com, 2012/04/18
- [Bug ld/13991] powerpc-rtems ld failure [regression], ralf.corsepius at rtems dot org, 2012/04/20
- [Bug ld/13991] powerpc-rtems ld failure [regression], joel.sherrill at oarcorp dot com, 2012/04/20
- [Bug ld/13991] powerpc-rtems ld failure [regression], ralf.corsepius at rtems dot org, 2012/04/20
- [Bug ld/13991] powerpc-rtems ld failure [regression], address@hidden, 2012/04/23
- [Bug ld/13991] powerpc-rtems ld failure [regression], joel.sherrill at oarcorp dot com, 2012/04/23
- [Bug ld/13991] powerpc-rtems ld failure [regression], joel.sherrill at oarcorp dot com, 2012/04/23
- [Bug ld/13991] powerpc-rtems ld failure [regression],
ian at airs dot com <=
- [Bug ld/13991] powerpc-rtems ld failure [regression], joel.sherrill at oarcorp dot com, 2012/04/23
- [Bug ld/13991] powerpc-rtems ld failure [regression], hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2012/04/23
- [Bug ld/13991] powerpc-rtems ld failure [regression], joel.sherrill at oarcorp dot com, 2012/04/23
- [Bug ld/13991] powerpc-rtems ld failure [regression], joel.sherrill at oarcorp dot com, 2012/04/23
- [Bug ld/13991] powerpc-rtems ld failure [regression], amodra at gmail dot com, 2012/04/23
- [Bug ld/13991] powerpc-rtems ld failure [regression], amodra at gmail dot com, 2012/04/23
- [Bug ld/13991] powerpc-rtems ld failure [regression], amodra at gmail dot com, 2012/04/23
- [Bug ld/13991] powerpc-rtems ld failure [regression], cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org, 2012/04/24
- [Bug ld/13991] powerpc-rtems ld failure [regression], amodra at gmail dot com, 2012/04/24
- [Bug ld/13991] powerpc-rtems ld failure [regression], joel.sherrill at oarcorp dot com, 2012/04/24