[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug gold/14344] FAIL: gdb_index_test_[12].sh
From: |
ccoutant at google dot com |
Subject: |
[Bug gold/14344] FAIL: gdb_index_test_[12].sh |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Jul 2012 08:15:28 +0000 |
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14344
--- Comment #3 from Cary Coutant <ccoutant at google dot com> 2012-07-10
08:15:28 UTC ---
> I think tests should accept both "const int" and "int const".
The point of the test is to make sure that it's in the canonical form
expected by GDB. For GCC 4.6, perhaps we should just treat this as an
XFAIL, or maybe have a configure check to turn off the test.
-cary
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
- [Bug gold/14344] New: FAIL: gdb_index_test_[12].sh, hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2012/07/10
- [Bug gold/14344] FAIL: gdb_index_test_[12].sh, hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2012/07/10
- [Bug gold/14344] FAIL: gdb_index_test_[12].sh, hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2012/07/10
- [Bug gold/14344] FAIL: gdb_index_test_[12].sh,
ccoutant at google dot com <=
- [Bug gold/14344] FAIL: gdb_index_test_[12].sh, hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2012/07/13
- [Bug gold/14344] FAIL: gdb_index_test_[12].sh, hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2012/07/13
- [Bug gold/14344] FAIL: gdb_index_test_[12].sh, cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org, 2012/07/18
- [Bug gold/14344] FAIL: gdb_index_test_[12].sh, ccoutant at google dot com, 2012/07/18