[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug gold/15200] Runtime undefined reference to __exidx_start/_end
From: |
petechou at gmail dot com |
Subject: |
[Bug gold/15200] Runtime undefined reference to __exidx_start/_end |
Date: |
Thu, 07 Mar 2013 06:43:08 +0000 |
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15200
--- Comment #7 from pete <petechou at gmail dot com> 2013-03-07 06:43:08 UTC ---
I can think visibility does matter, but only for exporting the symbol or not.
In the previous case, gold does define the __bss symbols but not use the
definition in DSO, so I think we should still define section/segment symbols
locally.
-Pete
(In reply to comment #6)
> The symbols do not have same visibility. gold in general is
> compatible with GNU ld. If you look at src/ld/emulparams/, you will
> set that the __bss symbols are exported but the __exidx symbols are
> defined hidden. gold matches the behaviour of ld. If you look at
> defstd.cc in gold, you will again see that some of these symbols are
> hidden but some are not.
>
> -Doug
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 9:31 PM, petechou at gmail dot com
> <address@hidden> wrote:
> > http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15200
> >
> > --- Comment #5 from pete <petechou at gmail dot com> 2013-03-07 05:31:25
> > UTC ---
> > (In reply to comment #4)
> >> The symbols __exidx_end & __exidx_start were exported incorrectly in
> >> the past. This is fixed in both ld & gold in the sense that these
> >> symbols are defined by not exported. I think defining these symbols
> >> when there is a non-weak definition in a DSO is not the right thing to
> >> do. This is basically multiple definition and usually is an error.
> >
> > If so, all section/segment symbols should be defined (if needed) by not
> > exported?
> >
> > But when there is a non-weak definition in a DSO, it's still possible to
> > find
> > ld.gold define and export segment symbols like __bss_start (See
> > gold.defstd.cc:214. only_if_ref is set to false). And there is no multiple
> > definition error.
> >
> > $ readelf -Ds libc.so | grep __bss_start
> > 268 311: 0000d898 0 NOTYPE GLOBAL DEFAULT ABS __bss_start__
> > 619 470: 0000d898 0 NOTYPE GLOBAL DEFAULT ABS __bss_start
> >
> > $ arm-linux-androideabi-ld.gold -shared -o libplasma.so plasma.o libc.so
> >
> > $ readelf -s libplasma.so | grep __bss_start
> > 73: 00004148 0 NOTYPE GLOBAL DEFAULT ABS __bss_start
> > 168: 00004148 0 NOTYPE GLOBAL DEFAULT ABS __bss_start
> >
> >> I am not working on the Android NDK so I can't give you a good
> >> suggestion here. Does using the latest NDK fixes your problem?
> >>
> >
> > Yes, there is no this issue with the latest NDK.
> >
> > -
> > Thanks,
> > Pete
> >
> > --
> > Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
> > ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> > You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
- [Bug gold/15200] Runtime undefined reference to __exidx_start/_end, petechou at gmail dot com, 2013/03/06
- [Bug gold/15200] Runtime undefined reference to __exidx_start/_end, dougkwan at google dot com, 2013/03/06
- [Bug gold/15200] Runtime undefined reference to __exidx_start/_end, petechou at gmail dot com, 2013/03/07
- [Bug gold/15200] Runtime undefined reference to __exidx_start/_end, dougkwan at google dot com, 2013/03/07
- [Bug gold/15200] Runtime undefined reference to __exidx_start/_end,
petechou at gmail dot com <=
- [Bug gold/15200] Runtime undefined reference to __exidx_start/_end, dougkwan at google dot com, 2013/03/07
- [Bug gold/15200] Runtime undefined reference to __exidx_start/_end, petechou at gmail dot com, 2013/03/12
- [Bug gold/15200] Runtime undefined reference to __exidx_start/_end, dougkwan at google dot com, 2013/03/12
- [Bug gold/15200] Runtime undefined reference to __exidx_start/_end, petechou at gmail dot com, 2013/03/19
- [Bug gold/15200] Runtime undefined reference to __exidx_start/_end, ian at airs dot com, 2013/03/19
- [Bug gold/15200] Runtime undefined reference to __exidx_start/_end, ian at airs dot com, 2013/03/19
- [Bug gold/15200] Runtime undefined reference to __exidx_start/_end, dougkwan at google dot com, 2013/03/20
- [Bug gold/15200] Runtime undefined reference to __exidx_start/_end, ian at airs dot com, 2013/03/20
- [Bug gold/15200] Runtime undefined reference to __exidx_start/_end, petechou at gmail dot com, 2013/03/20
- [Bug gold/15200] Runtime undefined reference to __exidx_start/_end, petechou at gmail dot com, 2013/03/20