[Bug binutils/16024] binutils-2.23.2/binutils/objdump.c:3663: possible missing break ?

[nickc at redhat dot com]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16024

Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |nickc at redhat dot com
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> ---
Hi DCB,

  Actually this is one of the few situations where a break statement is not
needed.  The usage() function called at line 3662 does not return...

  I have checked in a patch to add a comment to this effect and to label the
usage() function with ATTRIBUTE_NORETURN in case this helps your static tool.

Cheers
  Nick

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.