[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug binutils/16886] setjmp/longjmp in libopcodes would be faster as sig
|
From: |
rsc at swtch dot com |
|
Subject: |
[Bug binutils/16886] setjmp/longjmp in libopcodes would be faster as sigsetjmp w/ save=0 |
|
Date: |
Wed, 30 Apr 2014 19:28:54 +0000 |
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16886
Russ Cox <rsc at swtch dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|1 |0
--- Comment #2 from Russ Cox <rsc at swtch dot com> ---
As I said, I am using OS X. The implementation of setjmp (not longjmp) appears
to call both sigaltsatck and sigprocmask. Changing to sigsetjmp is the
important part. The change to siglongjmp just keeps the two in sync.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.