[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug binutils/14698] ar, nm and ranlib don't use gcc's liblto_plugin.so
From: |
gingold at adacore dot com |
Subject: |
[Bug binutils/14698] ar, nm and ranlib don't use gcc's liblto_plugin.so in BINDIR/../lib/bfd-plugins automatically |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Sep 2014 11:04:28 +0000 |
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14698
--- Comment #11 from gingold at adacore dot com <gingold at adacore dot com> ---
On 22 Sep 2014, at 12:58, markus at trippelsdorf dot de
<address@hidden> wrote:
> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14698
>
> --- Comment #10 from Markus Trippelsdorf <markus at trippelsdorf dot de> ---
> (In reply to address@hidden from comment #9)
>> Yes, but the behaviour has changed due to these lines (from the patch):
>>
>> +#if BFD_SUPPORTS_PLUGINS
>> +static const char *plugin_target = "plugin";
>> +#else
>> static const char *plugin_target = NULL;
>> +#endif
>
> Is BFD_SUPPORTS_PLUGINS defined on IBM AIX?
That's a property of the host, so yes it is defined at least if you build on
linux.
(I haven't tested on aix, but it supports dlfcn.h I think).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
- [Bug binutils/14698] ar, nm and ranlib don't use gcc's liblto_plugin.so in BINDIR/../lib/bfd-plugins automatically, gingold at adacore dot com, 2014/09/22
- [Bug binutils/14698] ar, nm and ranlib don't use gcc's liblto_plugin.so in BINDIR/../lib/bfd-plugins automatically, markus at trippelsdorf dot de, 2014/09/22
- [Bug binutils/14698] ar, nm and ranlib don't use gcc's liblto_plugin.so in BINDIR/../lib/bfd-plugins automatically, gingold at adacore dot com, 2014/09/22
- [Bug binutils/14698] ar, nm and ranlib don't use gcc's liblto_plugin.so in BINDIR/../lib/bfd-plugins automatically,
gingold at adacore dot com <=
- [Bug binutils/14698] ar, nm and ranlib don't use gcc's liblto_plugin.so in BINDIR/../lib/bfd-plugins automatically, markus at trippelsdorf dot de, 2014/09/22