[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug gold/20963] __executable_start isn't defined when linking executabl
|
From: |
mpercy at gmail dot com |
|
Subject: |
[Bug gold/20963] __executable_start isn't defined when linking executable against .so needing it, but ld does |
|
Date: |
Tue, 13 Dec 2016 15:51:10 +0000 |
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20963
--- Comment #2 from Mike Percy <mpercy at gmail dot com> ---
Upon further investigation by some others, this might not be a bug in gold, but
a bug in ld.so (which running ldd is showing).
nm --dynamic shows the symbol is defined (although it's defined differently to
how ld.bfd does it):
bfd:
0000000000000759 T __etext
U __executable_start
gold:
0000000000000858 A __etext
0000000000000000 A __executable_start
ld.so copes fine with __etext, but chokes on __executable_start.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.