bug-binutils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Bug gold/21062] New: Building GCC in LTO mode fails when using ld.gold


From: tulipawn at gmail dot com
Subject: [Bug gold/21062] New: Building GCC in LTO mode fails when using ld.gold on AARCH64
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 13:14:48 +0000

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21062

            Bug ID: 21062
           Summary: Building GCC in LTO mode fails when using ld.gold on
                    AARCH64
           Product: binutils
           Version: 2.28
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: gold
          Assignee: ccoutant at gmail dot com
          Reporter: tulipawn at gmail dot com
                CC: ian at airs dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

Hi,

I've never had to report any binutils bugs (the wonders of old platforms ;)) so
I'm not exactly sure how to proceed.

I've encountered the following bug related to gold and LTO:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78105

which only happens during LTO bootstrap on a Cortex A53 CPU (S905 SoC). Using
normal bootstrap or switching to ld.bfd is sufficient to complete the LTO
build. 

I rebuilt binutils yesterday (2.28.51.20170117) but the produced code still
crashes.

What I missed previously is the following kernel debug message which might be
relevant here. Any suggestions for exonerating gold and implicating the kernel
welcome:

[ 4802.696081] cc1[14840]: unhandled level 2 translation fault (11) at
0x00000000, esr 0x92000006
[ 4802.696092] pgd = ffffffc055a2c000
[ 4802.700620] [00000000] *pgd=0000000055693003, *pmd=0000000000000000

[ 4802.709039] CPU: 0 PID: 14840 Comm: cc1 Not tainted
3.14.29-amlogics905x-gb122fc2-dirty #9
[ 4802.709043] task: ffffffc054b62000 ti: ffffffc065e3c000 task.ti:
ffffffc065e3c000
[ 4802.709052] PC is at 0xffb8d0
[ 4802.709059] LR is at 0xffb638
[ 4802.709063] pc : [<0000000000ffb8d0>] lr : [<0000000000ffb638>] pstate:
60000000
[ 4802.709066] sp : 0000007ff62c4d00
[ 4802.709069] x29: 0000007ff62c5c30 x28: 0000000000000000 
[ 4802.709074] x27: 0000007ff62c51f0 x26: 000000000148fb40 
[ 4802.709079] x25: 0000007ff62c55b0 x24: 00000000013dd000 
[ 4802.709083] x23: 0000000000743c10 x22: 0000007ff62c5c50 
[ 4802.709087] x21: 0000007ff62c55b0 x20: 0000007ff62c4d70 
[ 4802.709092] x19: 0000007ff62c55b0 x18: 000000000000001d 
[ 4802.709096] x17: 0000007f8c274a40 x16: 00000000013e0058 
[ 4802.709100] x15: 0000000000000001 x14: 0000000000000000 
[ 4802.709104] x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000 
[ 4802.709109] x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 0000000000000000 
[ 4802.709113] x9 : 0000000000000000 x8 : 0000000000000000 
[ 4802.709117] x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 0000007ff62c5130 
[ 4802.709121] x5 : ffffffffffffffc0 x4 : 0000000000000000 
[ 4802.709126] x3 : 0000000000743e34 x2 : 0000000000000008 
[ 4802.709130] x1 : 00000000014bad88 x0 : 0000000000000008

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]