[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug ld/22115] ld: read-only segment has dynamic relocations.
|
From: |
cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org |
|
Subject: |
[Bug ld/22115] ld: read-only segment has dynamic relocations. |
|
Date: |
Sat, 09 Sep 2017 12:06:26 +0000 |
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22115
--- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org <cvs-commit at gcc dot
gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu <address@hidden>:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=0a27fed72d4190cc70025c671b5133e6c58d9c09
commit 0a27fed72d4190cc70025c671b5133e6c58d9c09
Author: H.J. Lu <address@hidden>
Date: Sat Sep 9 05:05:16 2017 -0700
x86: Properly handle __ehdr_start
After _bfd_i386_elf_convert_load and _bfd_x86_64_elf_convert_load are
removed, elf_i386_convert_load_reloc and elf_x86_64_convert_load_reloc
see __ehdr_start as an undefined symbol when they are called from
check_relocs to convert GOT relocations against local symbols. But
__ehdr_start will be defined as a hidden symbol by linker at the later
stage if it is referenced. This patch marks __ehdr_start as a defined
local symbol at the start of check_relocs if it is referenced and not
defined.
bfd/
PR ld/22115
* elf32-i386.c (elf_i386_convert_load_reloc): Check linker_def.
Don't use UNDEFINED_WEAK_RESOLVED_TO_ZERO.
* elf64-x86-64.c (elf_x86_64_convert_load_reloc): Check
linker_def. Don't use UNDEFINED_WEAK_RESOLVED_TO_ZERO.
* elfxx-x86.c (_bfd_x86_elf_link_check_relocs): Set local_ref
and linker_def on __ehdr_start if it is referenced and not
defined.
(_bfd_x86_elf_link_symbol_references_local): Also set local_ref
and return TRUE when building executable, if a symbol has
non-GOT/non-PLT relocations in text section or there is no
dynamic linker.
* elfxx-x86.h (elf_x86_link_hash_entry): Add linker_def.
ld/
PR ld/22115
* ld-i386/i386.exp: Run PR ld/22115 tests,
* ld/testsuite/ld-x86-64/x86-64.exp: Likewise.
* testsuite/ld-i386/pr22115-1.s: New file.
* testsuite/ld-i386/pr22115-1a.d: Likewise.
* testsuite/ld-i386/pr22115-1b.d: Likewise.
* testsuite/ld-i386/pr22115-1c.d: Likewise.
* testsuite/ld-i386/pr22115-1d.d: Likewise.
* testsuite/ld-x86-64/pr22115-1.s: Likewise.
* testsuite/ld-x86-64/pr22115-1a-x32.d: Likewise.
* testsuite/ld-x86-64/pr22115-1a.d: Likewise.
* testsuite/ld-x86-64/pr22115-1b-x32.d: Likewise.
* testsuite/ld-x86-64/pr22115-1b.d: Likewise.
* testsuite/ld-x86-64/pr22115-1c-x32.d: Likewise.
* testsuite/ld-x86-64/pr22115-1c.d: Likewise.
* testsuite/ld-x86-64/pr22115-1d-x32.d: Likewise.
* testsuite/ld-x86-64/pr22115-1d.d: Likewise.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.