[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug binutils/24554] New: [objcopy] --rename-section marking section NOB
From: |
ndesaulniers at google dot com |
Subject: |
[Bug binutils/24554] New: [objcopy] --rename-section marking section NOBITS |
Date: |
Tue, 14 May 2019 20:21:40 +0000 |
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24554
Bug ID: 24554
Summary: [objcopy] --rename-section marking section NOBITS
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: ndesaulniers at google dot com
Target Milestone: ---
via this thread from LKML: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/5/14/668
it seems that use of the flag `--rename-section .text=.rodata,alloc,readonly`
marks the resulting section as type NOBITS (PROGBITS was expected).
Is there an additional flag that we should be using, or is this considered a
bug?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
- [Bug binutils/24554] New: [objcopy] --rename-section marking section NOBITS,
ndesaulniers at google dot com <=