[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug binutils/24499] [PATCH] objcopy: provide cache for gnu_debuglink's
From: |
amodra at gmail dot com |
Subject: |
[Bug binutils/24499] [PATCH] objcopy: provide cache for gnu_debuglink's target CRC |
Date: |
Mon, 20 May 2019 13:21:10 +0000 |
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24499
--- Comment #6 from Alan Modra <amodra at gmail dot com> ---
Archives are typically used as static libraries, that is, they contain a group
of relocatable object files. I don't think that splitting off debug info to a
separate archive makes sense for relocatable object files. You'd make the
debug info unusable when linking the static library, and any gnu-debuglink
notes will be dropped by the linker.
So, what is in your foo.a that makes sense to objcopy --add-gnu-debuglink?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
- [Bug binutils/24499] [PATCH] objcopy: provide cache for gnu_debuglink's target CRC, janisozaur+sourceware at gmail dot com, 2019/05/10
- [Bug binutils/24499] [PATCH] objcopy: provide cache for gnu_debuglink's target CRC, janisozaur+sourceware at gmail dot com, 2019/05/10
- [Bug binutils/24499] [PATCH] objcopy: provide cache for gnu_debuglink's target CRC, amodra at gmail dot com, 2019/05/12
- [Bug binutils/24499] [PATCH] objcopy: provide cache for gnu_debuglink's target CRC, amodra at gmail dot com, 2019/05/12
- [Bug binutils/24499] [PATCH] objcopy: provide cache for gnu_debuglink's target CRC, janisozaur+sourceware at gmail dot com, 2019/05/17
- [Bug binutils/24499] [PATCH] objcopy: provide cache for gnu_debuglink's target CRC,
amodra at gmail dot com <=
- [Bug binutils/24499] [PATCH] objcopy: provide cache for gnu_debuglink's target CRC, janisozaur+sourceware at gmail dot com, 2019/05/22