[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug gold/30187] ld.bfd and ld.gold versions in .comment section of ELF
From: |
tkacvins at gmail dot com |
Subject: |
[Bug gold/30187] ld.bfd and ld.gold versions in .comment section of ELF files |
Date: |
Wed, 01 Mar 2023 18:32:14 +0000 |
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30187
--- Comment #2 from Tom Kacvinsky <tkacvins at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #1)
> (In reply to Tom Kacvinsky from comment #0)
> Hi Tom,
>
> > Results in the ld.gold version not being in the .comment section.
>
> But - just to be clear - it is in the .note.gnu.gold-version section:
>
> % readelf -p.note.gnu.gold-version a.out
>
> String dump of section '.note.gnu.gold-version':
> [ c] GNU
> [ 10] gold 1.16
>
> So this is a request for gold to add or move the version number into the
> .comment section, right ? And add the feature to ld too, of course.
Yes, this is correct - to make it more in line with what LLD does.
>
>
> Note - it is possible to achieve the desired effect using an extra object
> file:
>
> % cat ld-version.s
> .section .comment
> .asciz "GNU ld version 2.37-37.fc36";
> % gcc hello.c ld-version.s
> % readelf -p.comment
> [ 0] GCC: (GNU) 12.2.1 20221121 (Red Hat 12.2.1-4)
> [ 2e] GCC: (GNU) 12.0.1 20220413 (Red Hat 12.0.1-0)
> [ 5c] GNU ld version 2.37-37.fc36
>
> But I am sure that this is not what you want.
>
This is feasible in that we can use cmake to generate the .s file, or
perhaps generated a new object file everything we upgrade binutils.
But...
> Hmm, let me see if it is an easy thing to do...
This would be ideal if you or someone on the binutils team can do it.
Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
- [Bug gold/30187] New: ld.bfd and ld.gold versions in .comment section of ELF files, tkacvins at gmail dot com, 2023/03/01
- [Bug gold/30187] ld.bfd and ld.gold versions in .comment section of ELF files, tkacvins at gmail dot com, 2023/03/01
- [Bug gold/30187] ld.bfd and ld.gold versions in .comment section of ELF files, nickc at redhat dot com, 2023/03/01
- [Bug gold/30187] ld.bfd and ld.gold versions in .comment section of ELF files,
tkacvins at gmail dot com <=
- [Bug gold/30187] ld.bfd and ld.gold versions in .comment section of ELF files, nickc at redhat dot com, 2023/03/03
- [Bug gold/30187] ld.bfd and ld.gold versions in .comment section of ELF files, nickc at redhat dot com, 2023/03/03
- [Bug gold/30187] ld.bfd and ld.gold versions in .comment section of ELF files, tkacvins at gmail dot com, 2023/03/03
- [Bug gold/30187] ld.bfd and ld.gold versions in .comment section of ELF files, tkacvins at gmail dot com, 2023/03/03
- [Bug gold/30187] ld.bfd and ld.gold versions in .comment section of ELF files, nickc at redhat dot com, 2023/03/14
- [Bug gold/30187] ld.bfd and ld.gold versions in .comment section of ELF files, tkacvins at gmail dot com, 2023/03/14
- [Bug gold/30187] ld.bfd and ld.gold versions in .comment section of ELF files, tkacvins at gmail dot com, 2023/03/14
- [Bug gold/30187] ld.bfd and ld.gold versions in .comment section of ELF files, nickc at redhat dot com, 2023/03/15
- [Bug gold/30187] ld.bfd and ld.gold versions in .comment section of ELF files, tkacvins at gmail dot com, 2023/03/15
- [Bug gold/30187] ld.bfd and ld.gold versions in .comment section of ELF files, cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org, 2023/03/15