[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Bison 1.30e

From: Akim Demaille
Subject: Re: Bison 1.30e
Date: 28 Nov 2001 11:31:23 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Artificial Intelligence)

>>>>> "Hans" == Hans Aberg <address@hidden> writes:

Hans> If you check the example I sent you, you will find that the
Hans> numbers in the ...  case 36: #line 207 "op_parser.y ...  section
Hans> are correct, also for the implicit @n rules, whereas in the
Hans> table yyrline and .output, they are incorrect.

Let me say it again.  Please, show what you call incorrect.  Send your
grammar on the list, send the top of .output where the line numbers
are written, and tell me *where* it is wrong.  It doesn't look wrong
to me.  I just need to be pointed out to what you call wrong (given
that there is plenty of room for interpretation in the concept of `the
line number of a rule'.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]