[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Bison 1.50 experiences

From: Hans Aberg
Subject: Re: Bison 1.50 experiences
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 09:36:51 +0200

At 11:42 -0700 2002/10/15, Paul Eggert wrote:
>Anyway, it looks like we can redo Bison to not need any temp files at
>all, so the issue will be moot.

I found the file from Bison outputs to M4 useful when writing my own
skeleton files. This is the one I call short_basename + ".m4" and which
Bison does not unlink if one is asking for tracing.

I think though that the post-processing that Bison does of the M4 output
should be moved over to M4, if possible: Thus, giving M4 the capacity of
creating output files at need.

  Hans Aberg

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]