Re: glr.c YYFPUTC and YYFPUTS macros

[Paul Eggert]

address@hidden writes:

> On Tue, October 4, 2005 11:08 pm, Paul Eggert said:
>> Are you worried about programs that redefine the printf function, but
>> do not redefine putc/puts?
> yes.
>>  Do you know of programs that do that?
>> I would think that would be quite rare.
> true, but possible.

I've never or heard of such a thing; I don't think we need to worry
about it.

> it is a style issue. also generated parsers
> now have additional external linkage to
> puts+putc next to printf, right?
> older generated parsers only linked to printf.

Not true.  GCC optimizes printf calls into fwrite etc. calls, when GCC
can determine that the format string doesn't contain any % specifiers.
So older generated parsers already linked to functions other than
printf.

But anyway, I'm tired about arguing about style issues so I undid
the change.