[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: %destructor feedback

From: Joel E. Denny
Subject: Re: %destructor feedback
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 15:09:57 -0500 (EST)

On Wed, 21 Dec 2005, Akim Demaille wrote:

> >>> "Paul" == Paul Eggert <address@hidden> writes:
>  >> - we desire that in all the skeletons no $n is ever freed from an
>  >> "active" rule, even if we leave it using YYACCEPT, YYERROR, or
>  >> YYABORT.
>  > Yes, that sounds right.
> Well, AFAICS that's already the behavior in glr.c, isn't it?
> Otherwise I missed the bit of code that is wrong.

As I recall, it was just YYABORT and YYACCEPT in yacc.c that was a 
problem.  When I looked at the time, glr.c seemed fine.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]