[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: too many warnings from Bison CVS for Pike

From: Akim Demaille
Subject: Re: too many warnings from Bison CVS for Pike
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 09:15:22 +0100

Le 22 févr. 06 à 01:57, Joel E. Denny a écrit :

On Wed, 22 Feb 2006, Hans Aberg wrote:

On 21 Feb 2006, at 19:34, Joel E. Denny wrote:

If this usage is fine, then I wonder how "lalr1.cc" supports non- POD types
more than "yacc.c".  A footnote in the same section says that
`pseudo-unions' may alleviate this need for pointers in the future.

It does not currently.

Then the semantic type is a non-POD class

OK, so you #define YYSTYPE, I take it.  It seems that this usage is
addressed in "lalr1.cc", which I should have checked before. Akim, should
a sentence about this usage be added to section `10.1.2 C++ Semantic

I'd like to avoid continuing working with defines, but since people
seem to want to carve things into stone, let's do it.  I dislike this,
because it is not the way to go, that's merely the most convenient
option at this point.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]