[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Metasyntax glitch?

From: Paul Eggert
Subject: Re: Metasyntax glitch?
Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 17:06:37 -0700
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv: Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.0.8

On 10/01/2010 03:22 PM, Paul Hilfinger wrote:
> I am curious to know whether the
> syntax (accepted by bison) 
>       foo: bar
>          ; | baz
>          ; | thud
>          ;;;
> is actually intentional.

"Intentional"?  I don't know.  But but traditional yacc
supports it, and Bison is compatible.

I suppose you could write Steve Johnson and ask him whether
he really meant it when he wrote yacc lo these many years ago.
His contact info is at <http://www.yaccman.com/>.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]