[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 0/7] RFC: typed midrule actions

From: Hans Åberg
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] RFC: typed midrule actions
Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2018 17:57:08 +0200

> On 5 Aug 2018, at 16:09, Akim Demaille <address@hidden> wrote:
> I have been hesitating between 'midrule' and 'mid-rule'; both are used
> in user visible places (be it the documentation, error messages, or
> even command line options).  We should stick to a single spelling.
> Years ago Joel normalized all the 'lookaheads'/'look-aheads' to
> 'lookaheads', so I guess we should use 'midrule'.

AmE is more radical that BrE, e.g. midair vs mid-air according to a dictionary.

> My idea is to release 3.1 soon with these changes.  Which means
> addressing C++11 issues later, but I plan to focus on it right
> afterwards.

Note that C++11 and C++14 refer to C99, whereas GCC 6-8 has C11 as default. 
C++17 refer to C11, though.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]