[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: (non)Use of C++ 11 constructs in skeleton

From: Hans Åberg
Subject: Re: (non)Use of C++ 11 constructs in skeleton
Date: Sun, 19 May 2019 18:29:51 +0200

> On 19 May 2019, at 18:09, Akim Demaille <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Le 19 mai 2019 à 14:34, Hans Åberg <address@hidden> a écrit :
>>> I'll revert that for 3.4.1 then…
>> You must choose what you feel is best.
> With regards to C++, I have no doubt, as proved by Frank's pointer. 

Almost all uses of “copyable” come from C++11 it seems: The C++98 standard only 
has two occurrences. A net search with it and C++ gives 45 million hits, 
without C++ only a hundredth of that.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]