[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Should CommonC++-1.5.0/m4/ost_posix.m4 really be installed?
From: |
Adam J. Richter |
Subject: |
Should CommonC++-1.5.0/m4/ost_posix.m4 really be installed? |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Jun 2001 18:46:10 -0700 |
CommonC++-1.5.0 attemps to install CommonC++-1.50/m4/ost_check.m4
in /usr/share/aclocal/. As a result, subsequents runs of aclocal on
the CommonC++ source tree abort because aclocal sees duplicate macros
in CommonC++-1.50/m4/ost_check.m4 and /usr/share/aclocal/. Similarly,
ccscript sees the same type of conflict between its version of
ost_check.m4 and the one that CommonC++ put in /usr/share/aclocal/.
I have locally modified CommonC++-1.50/{m4,posix}/Makefile.am
to avoid this installation and can provide a patch to do so, although
I do not understand the situation well enough to know if this is the
right change.
Adam J. Richter __ ______________ 4880 Stevens Creek Blvd, Suite 104
address@hidden \ / San Jose, California 95129-1034
+1 408 261-6630 | g g d r a s i l United States of America
fax +1 408 261-6631 "Free Software For The Rest Of Us."
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Should CommonC++-1.5.0/m4/ost_posix.m4 really be installed?,
Adam J. Richter <=