bug-commoncpp
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Bug #3289] Function missing, v2 1.0.9, Datetime::Datetime( time_t tm )


From: nobody
Subject: [Bug #3289] Function missing, v2 1.0.9, Datetime::Datetime( time_t tm )
Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 09:14:25 -0400

=================== BUG #3289: LATEST MODIFICATIONS ==================
http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailbug&bug_id=3289&group_id=89

Changes by: Federico Montesino Pouzols <address@hidden>
Date: Sun 05/11/2003 at 15:14 (Europe/Madrid)

            What     | Removed                   | Added
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Resolution | None                      | Later
         Assigned to | None                      | fedemp
                  CC |                           | address@hidden


------------------ Additional Follow-up Comments ----------------------------

 Is this method missing for any particular reason I am not
able to see, or it simply was forgotten? In the latter case,
its implementation should be as simple as the implementation
of the constructor without parameters.



=================== BUG #3289: FULL BUG SNAPSHOT ===================


Submitted by: drzoom                  Project: commonc++                    
Submitted on: Mon 04/21/2003 at 14:42
Category:  None                       Severity:  5 - Major                  
Bug Group:  None                      Resolution:  Later                    
Assigned to:  fedemp                  Status:  Open                         

Summary:  Function missing, v2 1.0.9, Datetime::Datetime( time_t tm )

Original Submission:  This Function is currently missing, but declared in the 
header.

Follow-up Comments
*******************

-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Sun 05/11/2003 at 15:14       By: fedemp

 Is this method missing for any particular reason I am not
able to see, or it simply was forgotten? In the latter case,
its implementation should be as simple as the implementation
of the constructor without parameters.


CC List
*******

CC Address                          | Comment
------------------------------------+-----------------------------
address@hidden               | 



No files currently attached


For detailed info, follow this link:
http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailbug&bug_id=3289&group_id=89




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]