[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: __long64_t not declared AIX 5.3.0.50, gcc 4.0.2
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: __long64_t not declared AIX 5.3.0.50, gcc 4.0.2 |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Oct 2006 12:15:47 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Perry Smith <address@hidden> writes:
> I sent it to myself as well and I got the attachment. Looking in my
> outbox, the attachment is on all three notes.
Very strange. I didn't get the attachment in either of the
two emails you sent via the address@hidden mailing list.
Looking at the mailing list archive (which lags behind realtime by a
day or so), the most recently sent attachment
<http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2006-10/msg00237.html>
got expanded inline. Also, lists.gnu.org was down for a few hours
recently. Maybe they've changed how they handle attachments, and no
longer allow binary ones. That would be bad.
I'll CC: this message to address@hidden to let them know about the
problem. The messages we're talking about are
<address@hidden> (Received:
from [64.192.143.210] (helo=easeserver.easesoftware.com) by
monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GZpyI-0002KD-C4 for
address@hidden; Tue, 17 Oct 2006 10:31:11 -0400) and
<address@hidden> (Received:
from [64.192.143.210] (helo=easeserver.easesoftware.com) by
mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GZtOY-0007k6-2f for
address@hidden; Tue, 17 Oct 2006 14:10:30 -0400).
In the meantime, can you please send the info to bug-coreutils as
plain ASCII text, without attaching it? Thanks.
- __long64_t not declared AIX 5.3.0.50, gcc 4.0.2, Perry Smith, 2006/10/14
- Re: __long64_t not declared AIX 5.3.0.50, gcc 4.0.2, Paul Eggert, 2006/10/15
- Message not available
- Re: __long64_t not declared AIX 5.3.0.50, gcc 4.0.2, Paul Eggert, 2006/10/16
- Re: __long64_t not declared AIX 5.3.0.50, gcc 4.0.2, Perry Smith, 2006/10/17
- Re: __long64_t not declared AIX 5.3.0.50, gcc 4.0.2, Paul Eggert, 2006/10/17
- Re: __long64_t not declared AIX 5.3.0.50, gcc 4.0.2, Perry Smith, 2006/10/17
- Re: __long64_t not declared AIX 5.3.0.50, gcc 4.0.2, Jim Meyering, 2006/10/17
- Re: __long64_t not declared AIX 5.3.0.50, gcc 4.0.2, Perry Smith, 2006/10/17
- Re: __long64_t not declared AIX 5.3.0.50, gcc 4.0.2, Perry Smith, 2006/10/17
- Re: __long64_t not declared AIX 5.3.0.50, gcc 4.0.2,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: __long64_t not declared AIX 5.3.0.50, gcc 4.0.2, Perry Smith, 2006/10/17
- Re: __long64_t not declared AIX 5.3.0.50, gcc 4.0.2, Paul Eggert, 2006/10/18
- Message not available
- Re: __long64_t not declared AIX 5.3.0.50, gcc 4.0.2, Paul Eggert, 2006/10/18
- Re: __long64_t not declared AIX 5.3.0.50, gcc 4.0.2, Perry Smith, 2006/10/18
- Re: __long64_t not declared AIX 5.3.0.50, gcc 4.0.2, Paul Eggert, 2006/10/18
- Re: __long64_t not declared AIX 5.3.0.50, gcc 4.0.2, Perry Smith, 2006/10/18
- Re: __long64_t not declared AIX 5.3.0.50, gcc 4.0.2, Perry Smith, 2006/10/17
- mailing list attachments (was: __long64_t not declared AIX 5.3.0.50, gcc 4.0.2), Bob Proulx, 2006/10/17